Vendor Comparison

Comma Compliance vs. MirrorWeb

Looking for a MirrorWeb alternative? Comma Compliance delivers open-source capture, transparent flat-rate pricing, and SEC/FINRA-first exam readiness. Compare Comma vs. MirrorWeb.

MirrorWeb is used for digital communications archiving and surveillance. If you’re evaluating MirrorWeb competitors or looking for a modern MirrorWeb alternative for SEC or FINRA compliance, this page compares Comma Compliance and MirrorWeb across capture, archiving, and pricing transparency.

At a Glance

MirrorWeb is a UK-origin archiving and surveillance platform with broad channel and industry coverage, serving financial services, government, healthcare, and legal firms across SEC, FINRA, FCA, and MiFID II frameworks. Comma Compliance is purpose-built for US broker-dealers and RIAs, with flat-rate pricing, open-source capture code auditable on GitHub, and no NDA required to review how capture works under the hood.

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureComma ComplianceMirrorWeb
ArchitectureEnd-to-end — capture, archive, supervision, policy matching, and exam-ready case management, with open source transparency.Capture, archive, and AI supervision across a broad channel set; mobile capture via “Trusted Contacts” app (launched March 2025)
WORM storageYesYes
iMessage capture methodPoint-of-delivery — not iCloud-dependentVia Trusted Contacts app; capture method not publicly documented
WhatsApp captureCaptures both WhatsApp Business and personal WhatsAppYes — via Trusted Contacts app; capture method not publicly documented
Signal captureYes — open-source capture code published on GitHubYes — stated; capture method not publicly documented
TransparencyWhatsApp and Signal capture code published openly on GitHub, transparent pricing, Arc Relay MCP plane on GitHubCapture methodology not publicly disclosed
Channels supported35+ channels where conversations actually happen: iMessage, WhatsApp, Signal, SMS, Voice, Microsoft 365, Teams, Exchange, OneDrive, Gmail, Google Workspace, Slack, Zoom, Webex, Bloomberg Chat, Salesforce, Telegram, and moreRingCentral, WhatsApp, iMessage, SMS, RCS, Zoom SMS, WeChat, Microsoft Teams, Slack, Google Chat, Symphony, LinkedIn, X/Twitter, TikTok, YouTube, Facebook, Microsoft 365, Gmail, and websites
Pricing modelFlat monthly pricing, all channels included. No per-connector fees, no storage overages, no export fees. $33/user active, $15/user archival.Quote-based; not publicly listed; claims no per-GB or hidden fees
Free trialYesNot publicly offered
Personal vs. business separationAutomatic contact-based filtering — personal contacts can be excluded automaticallyVia Trusted Contacts app — employees opt in
Custom policy matchingYesYes
Case managementExam-ready — built for regulatory examination prepNot prominently documented for regulatory exam prep
AI compliance monitoringReal-time policy scanning; human validation before escalation; no client data used for training without consentSentinel engine
Supervisory analyticsPer-agent message volume, inbound/outbound ratios, sentiment scoring, policy violations by rep, and daily trend data — supervisor-level accountability by person, not just by messageNot documented
Data ownershipClient retains full ownership; never sold or shared outside authorized sub-processorsNot publicly detailed
Built-in archiveYes — included in platformYes — included

Competitor feature descriptions reflect publicly available documentation and may not capture all capabilities. Information is reviewed periodically.

Transparency

Comma’s WhatsApp and Signal capture methods are published on GitHub. You can read them, audit them, share them with legal, and ask detailed questions before signing. No NDA required.

MirrorWeb’s capture methodology — including how its Trusted Contacts app intercepts and archives messages at the device level — is not publicly documented. For firms with IT security review requirements before deployment, understanding the capture architecture is a prerequisite, not an afterthought.

Pricing

Comma publishes its pricing publicly. One flat rate, all channels included, exports free. MirrorWeb markets “clear pricing” but requires a discovery call before you see a number. Knowing the cost up front changes how fast you move through procurement.

For enterprise deployments — multi-entity networks, broker-dealer groups, RIA aggregators, custom data residency, or private cloud — talk to us about enterprise pricing.

The App Requirement

MirrorWeb’s mobile capture requires employees to download the Trusted Contacts app on their personal devices. That’s a meaningful deployment hurdle: employee adoption, device policy approvals, IT rollout, and ongoing management of app versions across a workforce. For firms operating under BYOD policies, asking employees to install compliance software on personal phones adds friction — and creates a gap whenever someone doesn’t.

Comma does not run on employee devices. No app to install, no MDM enrollment, no local footprint. Archiving happens off-device. If the message is delivered, it’s captured, regardless of whether the employee has updated an app or opted in that week.

See Comma in action.

Book a demo to see capture, supervision, and exam readiness side by side.

Due Diligence

Questions to Ask Any Compliance Vendor

  • 01

    Where exactly is the message first captured - at the point of delivery, or after a backup or sync cycle?

  • 02

    What conditions must be true for a message to be captured? What happens if any of those conditions aren't met?

  • 03

    If a user edits or deletes a message before capture occurs, what version gets archived?

  • 04

    Can you show documentation - architecture diagrams, code, or an independent audit - of how your capture actually works?

  • 05

    Where are encryption keys stored, and who controls them?

  • 06

    Are all channels included in the base price, or are there per-connector fees?

  • 07

    Are there export or egress fees?

  • 08

    Does your case management workflow support regulatory examination prep?

  • 09

    Can cases be opened directly from flagged message threads?

  • 10

    Is any client data used to train your models? Under what conditions?

  • 11

    Can we adjust, refine, or contribute feedback to my policy models? (e.g., different languages, customer-complaint responses)

Also compare